Filed: Oct. 28, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 01-60896 _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IRIS PITTMAN Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:01-CV-38-LN) - October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s pending state la
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 01-60896 _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IRIS PITTMAN Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:01-CV-38-LN) - October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s pending state law..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________________
Case No. 01-60896
__________________________
BANK ONE NA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
IRIS PITTMAN
Defendant-Appellant.
---------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(2:01-CV-38-LN)
---------------------------------------------
October 24, 2002
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM*:
Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting
Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the
Appellant’s pending state law claims and denying Appellant’s
request for abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury
trial. This case is indistinguishable from those that we
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Cause No. 01-60896
-2-
reviewed and ruled on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v.
Boyd2 and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake.3 For essentially the same
reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the
district court’s opinions in Bank One, N.A. v. Coates,4 and Bank
One, N.A. v. Taylor,5 the judgment of the district court in this
case is, in all respects,
AFFIRMED.
2
288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
3
No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
4
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
5
No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order
granting petition to compel arbitration).