Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bank One NA v. Pittman, 01-60896 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-60896 Visitors: 62
Filed: Oct. 28, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 01-60896 _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IRIS PITTMAN Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:01-CV-38-LN) - October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s pending state la
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                     __________________________

                          Case No. 01-60896
                     __________________________


BANK ONE NA

     Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.


IRIS PITTMAN


     Defendant-Appellant.

          ---------------------------------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Southern District of Mississippi
                          (2:01-CV-38-LN)
          ---------------------------------------------
                         October 24, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

     Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting

Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the

Appellant’s pending state law claims and denying Appellant’s

request for abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury

trial.   This case is indistinguishable from those that we



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                         Cause No. 01-60896
                                 -2-

reviewed and ruled on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v.

Boyd2 and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake.3   For essentially the same

reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the

district court’s opinions in Bank One, N.A. v. Coates,4 and Bank

One, N.A. v. Taylor,5 the judgment of the district court in this

case is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.




     2
            
288 F.3d 181
(5th Cir. 2002).
     3
            No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
     4
            
125 F. Supp. 2d 819
(S.D. Miss. 2001).
     5
          No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order
granting petition to compel arbitration).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer