Kinard v. Barnhart, 02-50284 (2002)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 02-50284
Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 28, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50284 Summary Calendar EARL D KINARD Plaintiff - Appellant v. JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant - Appellee - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-01-CV-348 SC - October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Earl D. Kinard appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s de
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50284 Summary Calendar EARL D KINARD Plaintiff - Appellant v. JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant - Appellee - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-01-CV-348 SC - October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Earl D. Kinard appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s dec..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50284 Summary Calendar EARL D KINARD Plaintiff - Appellant v. JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant - Appellee -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-01-CV-348 SC -------------------- October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Earl D. Kinard appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision which denied him disability insurance benefits. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion. See Kinard v. Barnhart, No. 01-CV-348 (W.D. Tex. March 13, 2002). AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
