Filed: Oct. 28, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 02-60397 Summary Calendar _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESSIE TAYLOR Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (4:01-CV-15-D-B) _ October 25, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 02-60397 Summary Calendar _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESSIE TAYLOR Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (4:01-CV-15-D-B) _ October 25, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s p..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________________
Case No. 02-60397
Summary Calendar
__________________________
BANK ONE NA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JESSIE TAYLOR
Defendant-Appellant.
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
(4:01-CV-15-D-B)
___________________________________________________
October 25, 2002
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM*:
Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank
One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s
pending state law claims and denying Appellant’s request for
abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury trial. This case
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
is indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in
the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd2 and Bank One, N.A. v.
Lake.3 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our
opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,
N.A. v. Coates,4 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,5 the judgment of the
district court in this case is, in all respects,
AFFIRMED.
2
288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
3
No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
4
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
5
No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order
granting petition to compel arbitration).
2