Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank One NA v. Taylor, 02-60397 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-60397 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 28, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Case No. 02-60397 Summary Calendar _ BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESSIE TAYLOR Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (4:01-CV-15-D-B) _ October 25, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                      __________________________

                           Case No. 02-60397
                            Summary Calendar
                      __________________________


BANK ONE NA

     Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.


JESSIE TAYLOR


     Defendant-Appellant.

         ___________________________________________________

             Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Mississippi
                           (4:01-CV-15-D-B)
         ___________________________________________________

                           October 25, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

     Appellant challenges the district court’s ruling granting Bank

One’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellant’s

pending state law claims and denying Appellant’s request for

abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury trial.    This case



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

                                  1
is indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in

the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd2 and Bank One, N.A. v.

Lake.3   For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our

opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,

N.A. v. Coates,4 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,5 the judgment of the

district court in this case is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.




     2
            
288 F.3d 181
(5th Cir. 2002).
     3
            No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
     4
            
125 F. Supp. 2d 819
(S.D. Miss. 2001).
     5
          No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order
granting petition to compel arbitration).

                                  2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer