Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert Alphee Trepanier v. Louis L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 27621 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 27621 Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 02, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 433 F.2d 1312 Robert Alphee TREPANIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee. No. 27621. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1970. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida at Jacksonville; William A. McRae, Jr., Judge. Davisson F. Dunlap (ct. appt.), Ellis E. Neder, Jr. (ct. appt.), Sears, Dunlap & Sears, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Atty.
More

433 F.2d 1312

Robert Alphee TREPANIER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections,
State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 27621.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida at Jacksonville; William A. McRae, Jr., Judge.

Davisson F. Dunlap (ct. appt.), Ellis E. Neder, Jr. (ct. appt.), Sears, Dunlap & Sears, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., J. Christian Meffert, nelson E. Bailey, James Robert Yon, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of appellant's petition for habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing on the claim of lack of counsel was held.

2

The evidentiary hearing was held in the United States District Court without the benefit of the state court record. Appellant and the State agree that although efforts were made to find such record, the efforts had been fruitless. Now, it appears, the state court record has been found, and counsel for the State agrees with appellant that the case should be remanded to the trial court for a further hearing, with the state court record available.

3

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings during which the trial court will consider the state record and such further evidence as may be necessary in light of the facts thus developed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer