Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tamez, 01-21118 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-21118 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-21118 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID SANTIAGO TAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H—01-CR-327-3 - November 5, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel representing David Santiago Tamez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 01-21118
                         Summary Calendar



                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

                              versus

                       DAVID SANTIAGO TAMEZ,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H—01-CR-327-3
                       --------------------
                         November 5, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel representing David Santiago Tamez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Tamez was provided

with a copy of counsel's Anders motion and brief, and he has filed

a response to counsel's motion to withdraw.

     Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and

Tamez’s opposition shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-21118
                               -2-

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; FED.

R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(A).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer