Filed: Nov. 14, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-51194 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISAIAS GOVEA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-252-1 - November 13, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Isaias Govea-Flores appeals from his conviction of transporting aliens. He contends solely that the evidence was insufficient t
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-51194 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISAIAS GOVEA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-252-1 - November 13, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Isaias Govea-Flores appeals from his conviction of transporting aliens. He contends solely that the evidence was insufficient to..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-51194
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISAIAS GOVEA-FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CR-252-1
--------------------
November 13, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Isaias Govea-Flores appeals from his conviction of
transporting aliens. He contends solely that the evidence was
insufficient to support his conviction. We review Govea-Flores’
argument for plain error because he did not renew his motion for
judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence. United States
v. Green,
293 F.3d 886, 895 (5th Cir. 2002).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-51194
-2-
Govea-Flores argues that the evidence was insufficient to
show that he knew the people he was transporting were aliens and
that his transportation of the aliens was in furtherance of their
illegal presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324. There
is no plain error as the record is neither devoid of evidence with
respect to these elements of a 8 U.S.C. § 1324 offense nor was the
evidence “so tenuous that a conviction would be shocking.” See
United States v. Laury,
49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.