Filed: Dec. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-51060 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDERICO JOSE MALDONADO-ALEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-00-CR-159-ALL - December 23, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federico Jose Maldonado-Aleman (Maldonado) appeals his conviction of illegal reentry into the United States after
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-51060 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDERICO JOSE MALDONADO-ALEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-00-CR-159-ALL - December 23, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Federico Jose Maldonado-Aleman (Maldonado) appeals his conviction of illegal reentry into the United States after h..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-51060
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FEDERICO JOSE MALDONADO-ALEMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-00-CR-159-ALL
--------------------
December 23, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Federico Jose Maldonado-Aleman (Maldonado) appeals his
conviction of illegal reentry into the United States after having
been convicted of an aggravated felony and deported. We AFFIRM.
Maldonado contends that his conviction should be reversed
because he is entitled to assert the invalidity of his July 2000
deportation order on authority of INS v. St. Cyr,
533 U.S. 289
(2001). Maldonado may not challenge the validity of that order,
however, because he has not shown (1) that he exhausted his
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-51060
-2-
administrative remedies relative to the order; (2) that he was
denied the opportunity for judicial review of the order; and (3)
that the entry of the order was fundamentally unfair. 8 U.S.C.
ยง 1326(d); see United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte,
186 F.3d
651, 658 n.8 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.