Filed: Dec. 05, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 02-10627 Summary Calendar MOSES C. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TXU GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (3:01-CV-79-M) December 3, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff Moses C. Ward appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant TXU Gas & Electric Co. on his 42 U.S.C.
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 02-10627 Summary Calendar MOSES C. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TXU GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (3:01-CV-79-M) December 3, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff Moses C. Ward appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant TXU Gas & Electric Co. on his 42 U.S.C. ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 02-10627
Summary Calendar
MOSES C. WARD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
TXU GAS & ELECTRIC CO.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
(3:01-CV-79-M)
December 3, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff Moses C. Ward appeals from the district court’s
grant of summary judgment for defendant TXU Gas & Electric Co. on
his 42 U.S.C. § 2000e claims alleging harassment, failure to
promote, and illegal termination on the basis of race, as well as
illegal retaliation by TXU for Ward’s pursuit of these claims. The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
district court granted summary judgment on grounds that Ward’s EEOC
petition was not timely filed, which acts as a bar to further
consideration of the claim.
Under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) a plaintiff must file an EEOC
complaint within 300 days of the date of the last alleged
discriminatory act, where he has also filed a complaint with the
appropriate state authorities. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1). Here,
the termination date was December 1, 1999. Delaware State College
v. Ricks,
449 U.S. 250, 261 (1980). Ward did not file his EEOC
complaint until October 11, 2000, however, 315 days after the date
of the last alleged discriminatory act. Accordingly, his claim is
barred by the statute of limitations. Webb v. Cardiothoracic
Surgery Associates of N. Tex., P.A.,
139 F.3d 532, 537 (5th Cir.
1998).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.