Filed: Jan. 02, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-30381 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOL ARNAZ DOUCETT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-20049-4) December 31, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carmen M. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Christol Arnaz Doucett, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as r
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-30381 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOL ARNAZ DOUCETT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-20049-4) December 31, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carmen M. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Christol Arnaz Doucett, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as re..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30381
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOL ARNAZ DOUCETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
(00-CR-20049-4)
December 31, 2002
Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carmen M. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Christol Arnaz
Doucett, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Once an
Anders brief has been filed, we must “conduct the familiar inquiry
as to whether there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal”,
considering the arguments made by appointed counsel along with any
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
issues raised by the defendant. United States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d
901, 902 (5th Cir. 1998).
Doucett has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and
has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief,
Doucett’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly: counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED;
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein; and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED
2