Filed: Feb. 01, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 453 F.2d 1366 STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 30693. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 1, 1972. Richard E. Reckson, Eugene C. Heiman, of Heiman & Crary, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. Martin E. Segal, Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Wesley G. Carey, Edward A. Perse, Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal &
Summary: 453 F.2d 1366 STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 30693. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 1, 1972. Richard E. Reckson, Eugene C. Heiman, of Heiman & Crary, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. Martin E. Segal, Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Wesley G. Carey, Edward A. Perse, Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & S..
More
453 F.2d 1366
STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE
ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of
Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 30693.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 1, 1972.
Richard E. Reckson, Eugene C. Heiman, of Heiman & Crary, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Martin E. Segal, Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Wesley G. Carey, Edward A. Perse, Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & Stobs, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees Wesley and Aetna.
Before TUTTLE, WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We are in agreement with the well considered memorandum opinion of the district court, State of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company, 316 F. Supp. 490 (S.D.Fla., 1970), and its judgment is affirmed.
