Filed: Apr. 12, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 461 F.2d 776 Moises MONDRAGON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 72-1624. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 12, 1972. Moises Mondragon, pro se. Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Charles J. Carroll, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded
Summary: 461 F.2d 776 Moises MONDRAGON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 72-1624. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 12, 1972. Moises Mondragon, pro se. Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Charles J. Carroll, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded ..
More
461 F.2d 776
Moises MONDRAGON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 72-1624.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 12, 1972.
Moises Mondragon, pro se.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Charles J. Carroll, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for expeditious reconsideration in light of the principles announced in Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 626; Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S. Ct. 1532, 23 L. Ed. 2d 57; and Harrington v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 1190.
