Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard T. Daniel, Jr. And Aena M. Daniel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 71-3419 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 71-3419 Visitors: 91
Filed: Jun. 26, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 461 F.2d 1265 72-2 USTC P 9517 Richard T. DANIEL, Jr. and Aena M. Daniel, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 71-3419. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 26, 1972. Cecil A. Ray, Jr., James K. Rushing, William P. Hallman, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for petitioners-appellants. K. Martin Worthy, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, William S. Estabrook, Attys., Tax
More

461 F.2d 1265

72-2 USTC P 9517

Richard T. DANIEL, Jr. and Aena M. Daniel, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-3419.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

June 26, 1972.

Cecil A. Ray, Jr., James K. Rushing, William P. Hallman, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for petitioners-appellants.

K. Martin Worthy, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, William S. Estabrook, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Loring W. Post, Murray S. Horwitz, Attys., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Before DYER, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Judge,* and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

We are in agreement with the well-reasoned opinion of the United States Tax Court in this case, Richard T. Daniel, Jr., 56 T.C. 655 (1971), and its judgment for the respondent is affirmed.

*

Judge Byron G. Skelton, U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer