Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard Jimenez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 72-1827 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 72-1827 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 18, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 468 F.2d 616 Richard JIMENEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 72-1827. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Oct. 18, 1972. Frances T. Freeman Cruz, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant. Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Roland Daniel Green, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondents-appellees. Before GEWIN, THORNBERRY and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The appellant Richard
More

468 F.2d 616

Richard JIMENEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of
Corrections, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 72-1827.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Frances T. Freeman Cruz, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Roland Daniel Green, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondents-appellees.

Before GEWIN, THORNBERRY and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appellant Richard Jimenez, a state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging that prison officials subjected him to mistreatment and cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The complaint was dismissed by the district court without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Jimenez v. Beto, 405 U.S. 910, 92 S. Ct. 989, 30 L. Ed. 2d 781 (1972); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S. Ct. 594, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652 (1972).

2

Vacated and remanded with directions.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer