Filed: Mar. 12, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-60182 Summary Calendar TITO GIRON-ESCOBAR, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A75 205 463 - March 12, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Alberto Giron, aka Tito Giron-Escobar, petitions this court to review the decision of Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his applications
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-60182 Summary Calendar TITO GIRON-ESCOBAR, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A75 205 463 - March 12, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Alberto Giron, aka Tito Giron-Escobar, petitions this court to review the decision of Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his applications ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-60182
Summary Calendar
TITO GIRON-ESCOBAR,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A75 205 463
--------------------
March 12, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Alberto Giron, aka Tito Giron-Escobar, petitions this
court to review the decision of Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
denying his applications for asylum, withholding deportation, and
voluntary departure. Much of Giron’s appeal challenges the
Immigration Judge’s adverse credibility determination regarding his
testimony. We will not, however, review such determinations. Chun
v. INS,
40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Giron presents no
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-60182
-2-
other evidence upon which to base his asylum application, the BIA’s
denial of his asylum application is supported by substantial
evidence.
Id. at 78-79. Additionally, we lack jurisdiction to
review Giron’s argument that the BIA erred in denying his request
for voluntary departure. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B) (referring to 8
U.S.C. § 1229(c)).
Giron’s petition for review is DENIED.