Filed: Apr. 14, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41015 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO BARRIENTOS-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-001-CR-496-ALL - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alfonso Barrientos-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States fo
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41015 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO BARRIENTOS-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-001-CR-496-ALL - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alfonso Barrientos-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States fol..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41015
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFONSO BARRIENTOS-LOPEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-001-CR-496-ALL
--------------------
June 19, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfonso Barrientos-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction
for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation,
in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his indictment
was defective under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did
not allege general intent.
Barrientos concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Fifth
Circuit precedent, but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-41015
-2-
Court review. Because the indictment in this case alleged a
violation of § 1326, Barrientos’ conviction is AFFIRMED. See
United States v. Berrios-Centeno,
250 F.3d 294, 299-300 (5th
Cir.), cert. denied,
122 S. Ct. 288 (2001).
AFFIRMED.