Filed: Apr. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-20511 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL MCCANN, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-610-12 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Daucie Elana Shefman, appointed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-20511 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL MCCANN, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-610-12 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Daucie Elana Shefman, appointed ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-20511
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAUL MCCANN, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-610-12
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Daucie Elana Shefman, appointed to represent Paul
McCann, Jr., on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). McCann has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and
brief. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-20511
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.