Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Youngblood v. Prudntl Ins Co Amer, 02-20530 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-20530 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 15, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-20530 KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and on behalf of Youngblood and Associates, PLLC, formerly known as Youngblood & White PLLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; ET AL Defendants, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District C
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-20530 KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and on behalf of Youngblood and Associates, PLLC, formerly known as Youngblood & White PLLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; ET AL Defendants, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-98-CV-1794 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We are persuaded that both subject matter jurisdiction in this case and the appropriateness of the district court order imposing * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. sanctions, including the amounts awarded, have been previously upheld in a previous appeal. We will not revisit those decisions. We are also persuaded that the awarded sanctions are enforceable as a money judgment under Rule 69, FED. R. CIV. PROC. Finally, we find no error in the district court order compelling discovery of certain information relating to fees, given its protection of privileged information. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer