Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Josephine Morgan Sutton v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 73-2581 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 73-2581 Visitors: 33
Filed: Nov. 14, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 487 F.2d 594 Josephine Morgan SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee. No. 73-2581 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nov. 14, 1973. E. Kontz Bennett, Jr., Waycross, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant. R. Jackson B. Smith, Jr., U. S. Atty., Henry L. Whisenhunt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Paul Merlin, Chief of Litigation, Steven M. Selzer, Atty., Soc. Sec. Di
More

487 F.2d 594

Josephine Morgan SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Secretary, United States Department of
Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 73-2581 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1973.

E. Kontz Bennett, Jr., Waycross, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

R. Jackson B. Smith, Jr., U. S. Atty., Henry L. Whisenhunt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Paul Merlin, Chief of Litigation, Steven M. Selzer, Atty., Soc. Sec. Div., Dept. of H. E. W., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 405(g) to review the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare's denial of disability insurance benefits to appellant. After careful review of the record we conclude that the District Court properly determined that there was substantial evidence on the record in support of the Secretary's decision. It was within the province of the Secretary to resolve the conflict in the medical evidence concerning whether appellant was disabled from engaging in substantial gainful activity. See Payne v. Weinberger, 5 Cir., 480 F.2d 1006 [1973].

2

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer