Filed: Jun. 05, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 5, 2003 FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 02-20895 (Summary Calendar) _ SELENA GORDON, also known as Jazmine; STEPHANIE MCDANIEL, also known as Simone; CHRISTINA SEARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus JKP ENTERPRISES INC., doing business as Caligula XXI, JERRY S. PAYNE, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 5, 2003 FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 02-20895 (Summary Calendar) _ SELENA GORDON, also known as Jazmine; STEPHANIE MCDANIEL, also known as Simone; CHRISTINA SEARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus JKP ENTERPRISES INC., doing business as Caligula XXI, JERRY S. PAYNE, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Souther..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 5, 2003 FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _________________ Clerk No. 02-20895 (Summary Calendar) _________________ SELENA GORDON, also known as Jazmine; STEPHANIE MCDANIEL, also known as Simone; CHRISTINA SEARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus JKP ENTERPRISES INC., doing business as Caligula XXI, JERRY S. PAYNE, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-99-CV-138 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Defendants JKP Enterprises, Inc., and Jerry S. Payne appeal the district court’s award of * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. attorneys fees to plaintiffs Selena Gordon, Stephanie McDaniel, and Christina Seard. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in determining the award of attorney’s fees in this case. Therefore, the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED. -2-
