In Re: McKenzie Engy, 02-21288 (2003)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 02-21288
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 11, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 11, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 02-21288 _ In re: MCKENZIE ENERGY CORP Debtor - EUROGAS INC Appellant v. W STEVE SMITH, Chapter 7 Trustee Appellee _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. H-02-CV-239 _ Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Affirmed for the reasons given by t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 11, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 02-21288 _ In re: MCKENZIE ENERGY CORP Debtor - EUROGAS INC Appellant v. W STEVE SMITH, Chapter 7 Trustee Appellee _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. H-02-CV-239 _ Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Affirmed for the reasons given by th..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 11, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 02-21288 _____________________ In re: MCKENZIE ENERGY CORP Debtor ----------------------- EUROGAS INC Appellant v. W STEVE SMITH, Chapter 7 Trustee Appellee _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. H-02-CV-239 _________________________________________________________________ Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Affirmed for the reasons given by the district court in its opinion and order entered on September 25, 2002. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
