Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-40754 Document: 00513383374 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40754 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ANGEL DELVALLE, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14-CR-826-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
Summary: Case: 15-40754 Document: 00513383374 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40754 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ANGEL DELVALLE, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14-CR-826-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:..
More
Case: 15-40754 Document: 00513383374 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-40754
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 17, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LUIS ANGEL DELVALLE,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:14-CR-826-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Angel Delvalle raises
an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586 F.3d 303,
308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is
not an element of a 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 offense. The motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.