Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-20684 Document: 00513382644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-20684 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ANGEL ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-191-4 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Summary: Case: 14-20684 Document: 00513382644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-20684 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ANGEL ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-191-4 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * ..
More
Case: 14-20684 Document: 00513382644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-20684
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 17, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN ANGEL ORTIZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CR-191-4
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Angel Ortiz has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ortiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 14-20684 Document: 00513382644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 14-20684
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2