Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-40318 Document: 00513383174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40318 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO DE LA VEGA-ADAN, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-15-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 15-40318 Document: 00513383174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40318 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO DE LA VEGA-ADAN, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-15-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 15-40318 Document: 00513383174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-40318
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 17, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANCISCO DE LA VEGA-ADAN,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:14-CR-15-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Francisco De La Vega-Adan
raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586 F.3d
303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of
drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952(a)
or 21 U.S.C. § 960(a). See United States v. Valencia-Gonzales,
172 F.3d 344,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-40318 Document: 00513383174 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40318
345-46 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Restrepo-Granda,
575 F.2d 524, 527
(5th Cir. 1978). The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2