Carol Davis v. Killeen Independent Sch Dist, 15-50960 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 15-50960
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-50960 Document: 00513467246 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-50960 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 15, 2016 CAROL DAVIS, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. KILLEEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; TOM SCHATTE; AMY FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:14-CV-336 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES
Summary: Case: 15-50960 Document: 00513467246 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-50960 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 15, 2016 CAROL DAVIS, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. KILLEEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; TOM SCHATTE; AMY FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:14-CV-336 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES,..
More
Case: 15-50960 Document: 00513467246 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-50960
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 15, 2016
CAROL DAVIS,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
KILLEEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; TOM SCHATTE; AMY
FOSTER,
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:14-CV-336
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carol Davis sued Defendants alleging various § 1983 and state claims.
The district court concluded that Davis failed to present any genuine issue of
material fact and granted Defendants’ summary judgment. We agree that
Davis offered no evidence to support her claims.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener