Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Roy Stojentin, 15-41713 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 15-41713 Visitors: 36
Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-41713 Document: 00513557867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41713 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROY WILLIAM STOJENTIN, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-631-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More
     Case: 15-41713      Document: 00513557867         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/21/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 15-41713
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            June 21, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROY WILLIAM STOJENTIN,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:15-CR-631-1


Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Roy William Stojentin raises
an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 
586 F.3d 303
,
308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is
not an element of a 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 offense. Accordingly, the motion for
summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer