Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-41359 Document: 00513557576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41359 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL MARTINEZ-ANDRES, also known as Miguel Ramo-Velasquez, also known as Mike Velasquez, also known as Miguel Romo Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the South
Summary: Case: 15-41359 Document: 00513557576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41359 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL MARTINEZ-ANDRES, also known as Miguel Ramo-Velasquez, also known as Mike Velasquez, also known as Miguel Romo Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southe..
More
Case: 15-41359 Document: 00513557576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-41359
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 21, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MANUEL MARTINEZ-ANDRES, also known as Miguel Ramo-Velasquez,
also known as Mike Velasquez, also known as Miguel Romo Velasquez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CR-438-1
Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Martinez-
Andres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Andres has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-41359 Document: 00513557576 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-41359
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2