Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-41367 Document: 00513557248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41367 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALVARO DAVILA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-51-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appeal
Summary: Case: 15-41367 Document: 00513557248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41367 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALVARO DAVILA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-51-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appeali..
More
Case: 15-41367 Document: 00513557248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-41367
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 21, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ALVARO DAVILA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:15-CR-51-1
Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Alvaro Davila raises an
argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez,
711 F.3d 541, 562
(5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary
definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be
below 17 years old. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.