Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-11413 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-11413 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed c..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-11413
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3
--------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Gustavo Galindo Ramirez
(Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Ramirez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and
brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-11413
-2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.