Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ramirez, 01-11413 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-11413 Visitors: 42
Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-11413 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  August 20, 2003

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                             No. 01-11413
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo
                                   Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3
                       --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Gustavo Galindo Ramirez

(Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Ramirez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response.    Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-11413
                               -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer