Filed: Aug. 18, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-31175 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWARD D. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-30026-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James H. Looney, court-appointed couns
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-31175 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWARD D. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-30026-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James H. Looney, court-appointed counse..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-31175
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWARD D. MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-30026-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James H. Looney, court-appointed counsel for Edward D.
Mitchell, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Mitchell has filed a response arguing that his trial counsel was
ineffective for failing to argue at sentencing that Mitchell was
not a leader or organizer under U.S.S.G. ยง 3B1.1(a).
Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-31175
-2-
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.