Filed: Oct. 07, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 7, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41208 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME ALVAR CARVAJAL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-109-4 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jaime Alvar Carvajal appeals from an ord
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 7, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41208 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME ALVAR CARVAJAL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-109-4 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jaime Alvar Carvajal appeals from an orde..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 7, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41208
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME ALVAR CARVAJAL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-109-4
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jaime Alvar Carvajal appeals from an order of the district
court affirming the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order.
The district court’s decision rests upon its conclusion that
Carvajal has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or
combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of
the community if Carvajal is released. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e) &
(f). Analysis of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)
indicates that the district court’s conclusions are supported by
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-41208
-2-
the record. See United States v. Rueben,
974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th
Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.