Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-50042 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL GRAY, also known as “Paul,” also known as Travis Knight, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-418-7 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judge
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-50042 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL GRAY, also known as “Paul,” also known as Travis Knight, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-418-7 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 03-50042 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAUL GRAY, also known as “Paul,” also known as Travis Knight,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-01-CR-418-7
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Paul Gray has filed a
motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Gray has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.