Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30674 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BODERICK LAMOTHE, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-215-ALL-C - - - - - - - - - - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30674 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BODERICK LAMOTHE, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-215-ALL-C - - - - - - - - - - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-30674
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BODERICK LAMOTHE,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 01-CR-215-ALL-C
- - - - - - - - - -
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The lawyer appointed to represent Boderick Lamothe on appeal
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this
case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.