Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lamothe, 02-30674 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-30674 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30674 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BODERICK LAMOTHE, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-215-ALL-C - - - - - - - - - - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER C
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  December 10, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                           No. 02-30674
                       Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BODERICK LAMOTHE,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                     USDC No. 01-CR-215-ALL-C
                        - - - - - - - - - -

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The lawyer appointed to represent Boderick Lamothe on appeal

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this

case, and the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer