Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Aguirre-Vasquez, 02-40889 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-40889 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-40889 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE AGUIRRE-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-620-01 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert Julius Lerma, the att
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 10, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 02-40889
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE AGUIRRE-VASQUEZ,
                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-01-CR-620-01
                        --------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Robert Julius Lerma, the attorney appointed to represent

Jose Aguirre-Vasquez, has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Aguirre-Vasquez has filed no response to Lerma’s

motion.   Our independent review of the record and Lerma’s brief

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, Lerma’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

Lerma is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer