Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30646 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE FRANCISCO GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-20126-1 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defend
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30646 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE FRANCISCO GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-20126-1 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defende..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-30646
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE FRANCISCO GUZMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 02-CR-20126-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender representing Jose Francisco
Guzman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guzman
was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-30646
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.