Filed: Feb. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20455 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR MAXFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-165-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Arthur Maxfield
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20455 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR MAXFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-165-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Arthur Maxfield h..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-20455
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR MAXFIELD,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CR-165-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Arthur Maxfield has moved for leave to withdraw
from this appeal and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.