Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Pavia, 03-41015 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41015 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jan. 29, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 29, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41015 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VERONICA M. PAVIA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-28-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to r
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         January 29, 2004
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk

                             No. 03-41015
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VERONICA M. PAVIA,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 1:03-CR-28-1
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Veronica

M. Pavia on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).

Pavia has not filed a response.     Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this

direct appeal.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer