Filed: Feb. 04, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50177 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DORA ALICIA MARTINEZ-CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-486-2-FB - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50177 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DORA ALICIA MARTINEZ-CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-486-2-FB - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender ap..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-50177
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DORA ALICIA MARTINEZ-CANTU,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-02-CR-486-2-FB
--------------------
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dora
Alicia Martinez-Cantu (“Martinez”) has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but she has not filed a response.
Based on our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the
record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-50177
-2-
appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.