Filed: Mar. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 24, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10812 Summary Calendar CARDELL RHETT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WAYNE SCOTT; ET AL., Defendants, T. REVELL; NFN GONZALEZ, Defendants-Appellants. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CV-114 - Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Dr. William Gonz
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 24, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10812 Summary Calendar CARDELL RHETT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WAYNE SCOTT; ET AL., Defendants, T. REVELL; NFN GONZALEZ, Defendants-Appellants. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CV-114 - Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Dr. William Gonza..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 24, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10812
Summary Calendar
CARDELL RHETT, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WAYNE SCOTT; ET AL.,
Defendants,
T. REVELL; NFN GONZALEZ,
Defendants-Appellants.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:96-CV-114
--------------------
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Dr. William Gonzalez and Dr. Tim Revell appeal from the
district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in
Cardell Rhett, Jr.’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court
determined that Rhett had produced sufficient evidence to create a
genuine issue of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to
1
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
his serious medical needs. We lack jurisdiction to review the
district court’s determination. Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t,
86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir. 1999).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
2