Mitchell's Fruit v. Quaglino Tobacco, 95-31302 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-31302
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 25, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 95-31302 Summary Calendar MITCHELL’S FRUIT STAND, doing business as Mitchell’s Munch Wagon; FRANK MITCHELL SR.; KAYLYN MITCHELL; WENDY MITCHELL, minor daughter of Lucinda Mitchell; LUCINDA JOSEPH; YOLANDA JOSEPH; NATHANIEL JOSEPH Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS QUAGLIANO TOBACCO & CANDY COMPANY, ET AL Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana June 14, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DU
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 95-31302 Summary Calendar MITCHELL’S FRUIT STAND, doing business as Mitchell’s Munch Wagon; FRANK MITCHELL SR.; KAYLYN MITCHELL; WENDY MITCHELL, minor daughter of Lucinda Mitchell; LUCINDA JOSEPH; YOLANDA JOSEPH; NATHANIEL JOSEPH Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS QUAGLIANO TOBACCO & CANDY COMPANY, ET AL Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana June 14, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUH..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 95-31302 Summary Calendar MITCHELL’S FRUIT STAND, doing business as Mitchell’s Munch Wagon; FRANK MITCHELL SR.; KAYLYN MITCHELL; WENDY MITCHELL, minor daughter of Lucinda Mitchell; LUCINDA JOSEPH; YOLANDA JOSEPH; NATHANIEL JOSEPH Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS QUAGLIANO TOBACCO & CANDY COMPANY, ET AL Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana June 14, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Careful review of the pleadings and record indicate no error on the part of the district court. Accordingly, for the reasons given by the district court, its judgment is AFFIRMED. 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
