Georgia Pacific v. Granite State Ins, 96-30813 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 96-30813
Visitors: 31
Filed: Mar. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-30813 _ GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION Plaintiff - Appellant v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON; CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (90-CV-1195-A) _ August 7, 1997 Before KING, DUHE’ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-30813 _ GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION Plaintiff - Appellant v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON; CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (90-CV-1195-A) _ August 7, 1997 Before KING, DUHE’ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed f..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ______________________ No. 96-30813 _______________________ GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION Plaintiff - Appellant v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON; CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES Defendants - Appellees ______________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (90-CV-1195-A) _______________________________________________________________ August 7, 1997 Before KING, DUHE’ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
