Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hallco Texas, Inc v. McMullen County, TX, 96-40766 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-40766 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 06, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 96-40766 Summary Calendar HALLCO TEXAS, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS McMULLEN COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (L-95-CV-22) February 25, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In this case, appellant, Hallco Texas, Inc., purchased land with the intent of using it as a disposal site for non-hazardous waste in McMullen County
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 96-40766 Summary Calendar HALLCO TEXAS, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS McMULLEN COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (L-95-CV-22) February 25, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In this case, appellant, Hallco Texas, Inc., purchased land with the intent of using it as a disposal site for non-hazardous waste in McMullen County. After Hallco’s application for a solid waste permit was approved by the Texas Natural Resource Conversation Commission, the McMullen County Commissioner’s Court adopted an ordinance prohibiting solid waste disposal within three miles of Choke Canyon Lake. Because Hallco’s proposed site is * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. within this area, it brought this action for a declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional and for money damages. Appellee McMullen County moved to dismiss the suit or alternatively stay the proceedings. Hallco based its equal protection claim on the contention that the ordinance created separate classifications for landfill facilities and treated Hallco’s proposed facility differently than other McMullen County facilities. The district court held that the ordinance on its face is rationally related to the legitimate state objective of land zoning and does not violate the equal protection clause. Hallco appealed. For the reasons expressed more fully in the trial court’s opinion, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer