Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. White, 03-10371 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-10371 Visitors: 47
Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10371 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JIMMY EARL WHITE, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-304-ALL-D - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy E
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 21, 2004

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 03-10371
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY EARL WHITE, JR.,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 3:02-CR-304-ALL-D
                        --------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Earl White, Jr., has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     White has not filed a

response.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal.    Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-10371
                               -2-

further responsibilities herein.   The appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer