Filed: Mar. 29, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 29, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 03-10602 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus ANTHONY RAY ALLEN, Defendant/Appellee. _ No. 03-10611 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus BILLY GENE MOORE, Defendant/Appellee. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division District Court Cause
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 29, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 03-10602 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus ANTHONY RAY ALLEN, Defendant/Appellee. _ No. 03-10611 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus BILLY GENE MOORE, Defendant/Appellee. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division District Court Cause N..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 29, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 03-10602 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus ANTHONY RAY ALLEN, Defendant/Appellee. _____________________ No. 03-10611 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, versus BILLY GENE MOORE, Defendant/Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division District Court Cause No. 3:02-CR-301 _________________________________________________________________ Before JONES, WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 PER CURIAM. The court has considered the appellant's argument in light 1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, this Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. of oral argument, the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED.
