Tyler v. Williamson Ind Inc, 03-60205 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 03-60205
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 03-60205 Summary Calendar _ BARBARA ANN TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAMSON INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi District Court Cause No. 01-CV-380 _ Before JOLLY, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 PER CURIAM: The court has consider
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 03-60205 Summary Calendar _ BARBARA ANN TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAMSON INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi District Court Cause No. 01-CV-380 _ Before JOLLY, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 PER CURIAM: The court has considere..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 03-60205 Summary Calendar _____________________ BARBARA ANN TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAMSON INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi District Court Cause No. 01-CV-380 _________________________________________________________________ Before JOLLY, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.1 PER CURIAM: The court has considered the appellant's arguments in light of oral argument, the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. 1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, this Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
