Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas F. Strother v. Exxon Corporation, Exxon Pipeline Co. And/or Exxon Pipeline, Inc., 77-2695 (1978)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 77-2695 Visitors: 38
Filed: Apr. 26, 1978
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 572 F.2d 136 Thomas F. STROTHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON CORPORATION, Exxon Pipeline Co. and/or Exxon Pipeline, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-2695 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 26, 1978. Aaron Frank McGee, Eunice, La., for plaintiff-appellant. E. Burt Harris, I. David Warner, III, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees. Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice to a futur
More

572 F.2d 136

Thomas F. STROTHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EXXON CORPORATION, Exxon Pipeline Co. and/or Exxon Pipeline,
Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-2695
Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 26, 1978.

Aaron Frank McGee, Eunice, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

E. Burt Harris, I. David Warner, III, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice to a future appeal following the district court's review of the magistrate's report and entry of final judgment by the district court. Kendall v. Davis, 569 F.2d 1330 (CA5, 1978).

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer