Filed: Jun. 02, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30983 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RYAN D. ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-50002-ALL - Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appointed counsel for Ryan D. Roberson has f
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30983 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RYAN D. ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-50002-ALL - Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appointed counsel for Ryan D. Roberson has fi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-30983
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RYAN D. ROBERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 03-CR-50002-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appointed counsel for Ryan D. Roberson has filed a motion
to withdraw and an accompanying brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Roberson has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We note, however,
that the bill of information charged Roberson with conspiracy to
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-30983
-2-
distribute cocaine base but the judgment states the offense as
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base.
Accordingly, Roberson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED, but the matter is REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT for
correction of the clerical error pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.