Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20196 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO MORENO-LARIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-697-2 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Roberto M
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20196 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO MORENO-LARIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-697-2 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Roberto Mo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-20196
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO MORENO-LARIOS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-697-2
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Roberto Moreno-Larios has
requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Moreno-Larios has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.