Filed: Jul. 08, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21018 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v FREDERICK GROVE Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CR-81-6 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate counsel for defe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21018 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v FREDERICK GROVE Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CR-81-6 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate counsel for defen..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 8, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-21018
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v
FREDERICK GROVE
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-03-CR-81-6
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Frederick
Grove has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Grove has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of the
briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Appointed counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.