Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lucio-Flores, 03-41147 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41147 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41147 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL LUCIO-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-112-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to rep
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit


                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                               FILED
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                June 23, 2004

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                              No. 03-41147
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL LUCIO-FLORES,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. L-00-CR-112-1
                         --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul

Lucio-Flores (Lucio) has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Lucio was notified but filed no response.       Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal.   The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer